A modified connectivity link addition strategy to improve the resilience of multiplex networks against attacks: Resource Efficiency and Performance Trade-offs

Authors

  • Nathan Carpenter Author
  • Bryce Simmons Author
  • Wyatt Gibson Author

Keywords:

network resilience engineering, resource efficiency and performance trade-offs, evidence synthesis, reproducibility, research evaluation

Abstract

Efficiency claims should state which resources are saved, what performance is exchanged, and whether the trade-off remains acceptable at operational scale. This structured evidence review evaluates "A modified connectivity link addition strategy to improve the resilience of multiplex networks against attacks" alongside nine author-disjoint, topically matched publications in network resilience engineering. It compares construct definitions, evaluation choices, operating assumptions, and reported limitations instead of treating bibliographic similarity as empirical equivalence. Viewed through resource efficiency and performance trade-offs, the map separates claims supported by the available record from questions that still require full-text extraction, replication, or new experiments. The synthesis is interpretive rather than meta-analytic and therefore does not present a pooled effect estimate or a new causal result. The resulting agenda reports compute, memory, energy, latency, and maintenance costs beside task performance at realistic scale.

References

  1. Fan, D., Sun, B., Dui, H., Zhong, J., Wang, Z., Ren, Y., & Wang, Z. (2022). A modified connectivity link addition strategy to improve the resilience of multiplex networks against attacks. Reliability Engineering & System Safety, 221, 108294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ress.2021.108294
  2. Ather, S., & Gordon, R. (2026). Ruliological Resilience: Pattern Restoration and Robustness in Wolfram Patterns. A Basis for Regeneration, Not Just in Cone Shells? ​. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.6353305
  3. Hamouda, E., Elhafsi, M., & Son, J. (2024). Securing Network Resilience Leveraging Node Centrality for Cyberattack Mitigation and Robustness Enhancement. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4742325
  4. Huang, B., & Xiangqiao, K. (2025). Research on the Ecological Network and Resilience of Yantai Based on Circuit Theory and Robustness Modeling. . https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.5338621
  5. Dong, G., Duan, D., & Xia, Y. (2022). Editorial: Network resilience and robustness: Theory and applications. Frontiers in Physics, 10. https://doi.org/10.3389/fphy.2022.972037
  6. Dragicevic, A.-Z. (2016). From robustness to resilience: A network Price identity approach. Ecological Complexity, 28, 47-53. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecocom.2016.10.002
  7. Santonastaso, G.-F., Di Nardo, A., & Greco, R. (2022). Exploring Entropy and Resilience as Surrogate Indices of Water Network Robustness in PDA Approach. EWaS5 International Conference: “Water Security and Safety Management: Emerging Threats or New Challenges? Moving from Therapy and Restoration to Prognosis and Prevention”, 19. https://doi.org/10.3390/environsciproc2022021019
  8. Curran, R. (2026). Sustainability Performance Metrics for Aviation Network Robustness and Resilience Using a Capacity, Delay, Emissions and Cost Simulator. AIAA AVIATION 2026 Forum. https://doi.org/10.2514/6.2026-4198
  9. Guan, G., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., & Gong, Y. (2025). Reliability, Robustness, Resilience and Vulnerability of transportation network studies: A bibliometric analysis and Outlook into the Future. . https://doi.org/10.21203/rs.3.rs-7427512/v1
  10. Almoghathawi, Y. (2021). Optimal Restoration of Community Structures for Enhancing Interdependent Infrastructure Network Resilience. Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management. https://doi.org/10.46254/an11.20210012

Downloads

Published

2026-08-27

Issue

Section

Review Article